Jun 23, 2008

Formula One - Go Kimi

Today let's talk about F-1 racing.

I started watching F-1 in 2002. The eye-catching McLaren artwork immediately caught my eyes. They put their drivers' first name on the side of the race car, so big that you know who's in it. And they got a youngster named Kimi.

I was never a Ferrari fan. The main reason is that Michael Schumacher just does not act sincere enough as an established multiple time World Champion. Therefore I quickly rooted for someone that was capable of beating Ferrari, and that was McLaren.

A little bit of research gave me an idea about their glorious past with Senna and Prost. And Kimi was definitely given the permission to win without noticeable obstruction from DC. He quickly outpaced his teammates and started to win races in 2003. Through his years with McLaren, his championship hope was always plagued by the performance of the race car, or persistant bad luck.

Everyone knows he is the quickest, most talented driver in F-1, but his bad fortune gave him twice as runner-up in driver's championship, one lost to MS and the other to FA. His signature drive so far is the 2005 Japanese GP at Suzaka, in which he started at 17th on grid but fought his way up and eventually passed Fisichella at the first corner of the final lap, and went on to win the race!

In 2007 he switched to Ferrari to take the open seat left by MS. Before the last race in Brazil, he was 7 points behind LH, and 3 points behind FA, credited to McLaren's long traditioned driver equality. Thanks to his marvelous drive with some help from his teammate Massa taking 2nd place, FA taking 3rd place, and LH's mistake which giving him 7th, Kimi finally won his first championship by only 1 point advantage against both LH and FA. A championship long overdued, but thankfully he managed to join the elites.

Kimi does not speak much, not to mention excuse. He lets his driving do the talking, and everyone else shuts up and listens. That is the way I like about him.

iPhone 3G - What Disappoints Me

iPhone 3G is set for July 11. I am probably buying one, for the reason that the Nokia N95 I have right now just cannot do the internet and email right. However, there are still things about iPhone that I think Apple trys to play dumb on us.

First, camera. No upgrade on camera pixel. No flash. No video recording. What a bummer! This is an obvious update that no one wouldn't neglect. Still, Apple knows we are going to buy it even without these camera upgrade. So they underplay the camera and instead taunt their 2.0 software platform as the focus. And for sure they will update the camera this time next year and somebody will need to pay for this easy upgrade that should have been done by now.

Second, plastic back cover?! What's wrong with Apple's aesthetic taste?! Do they not know the poor polycarbonate plastic cover is prone to scratch? My MacBook has already suffered from these terrible scratches and yet I have to let my next iPhone go through the same kind of pain? This is just way too much for the "cost down" process. Carriers are paying subsidy so how much less Apple would make with a decent iondized aluminum back cover for the customers?

Third, memory size. It's just a matter of time before the 16 GB gets filled with songs, videos, and the apps they sell.

And I know Apple knows all these shortcomings. They just sacrifice these features for future upgrades and we customers will again have to fund these overdued upgrades next year.

Jun 20, 2008

Mac Pro 8 Cores 2.8 GHz

I could not overcome the temptation of an entry level octa-core Mac Pro. Therefore I forked in almost $3K for one with 6 GB RAM and an additional 500 GB drive for time machine backup.

All in all it is impressive as a workstation. I haven't had a chance to compile a program for parallel computing on it though. Anyways this one should last much longer than the fragile MacBook. Desktop units are really built for expansion and durability purposes, suitable for a performance oriented user like me. However for in-bed use MacBook is still in service.